Reducing Editorial Workload with Automated Publishing Workflows in CMS

If you’ve ever had your hands full managing articles, posts, or any digital content, you know how stressful it can get. 

Editorial teams juggle deadlines, feedback chains, and quality standards—all while racing against the clock to keep readers or customers happy. Tasks overlap, steps get missed, and sometimes, a well-meaning editor spends hours tweaking a headline that gets seen by three people.

Over the years, I’ve watched content teams get buried under endless rounds of edits and complicated approvals. The pressure gets even worse when content has to be published across several platforms at once. That’s where automated publishing workflows in content management systems (CMS) come in. They don’t just make things easier—they help keep everyone sane.

This article will take you through what automation in publishing means, how it actually works in popular CMS tools, and practical steps you can take to reduce the grind on your editorial team. I’ll break down the big ideas, answer common questions, and share advice based on what editors (and I) have experienced over years of wrangling digital content.

What Is an Automated Publishing Workflow?

Let’s keep this simple. An automated publishing workflow is a series of steps—like creating, editing, reviewing, and posting content—that runs mostly by itself inside your CMS. Usually, these steps would need people to trigger them by hand, one after the next. With automation, once you set the steps up, your CMS takes care of moving the content forward, sending notifications, and checking requirements. You set the process once, and the system follows it each time.

Why Bother with Automation?

If you’re managing a blog, news site, or company website, you probably know the pain of endless emails, lost feedback, or posts going live before they’re ready. Automated workflows help fix these problems. They can:

  • Cut down on the number of manual tasks your team does.

  • Make sure nothing important slips through the cracks.

  • Keep track of who needs to do what, and when.

  • Get content published faster (and with fewer mistakes).

Think of it like a coffee machine: set up your order, press a button, and it delivers the same quality every time. No more “Oops, I forgot the sugar.”

How Editorial Work Has Changed (and Gotten More Complicated)

Years ago, editing meant fixing grammar and maybe rewriting a headline. Now? Content is king, queen, and possibly the entire chessboard. Teams handle:

  • Multiple formats: blog posts, emails, social updates, eBooks, more.

  • Complicated approval processes, so nothing goes out unreviewed.

  • Demands to personalize and optimize content for different audiences.

  • Publishing the same info on several sites and apps at once.

With so many steps, it’s easy for an editor to feel like they’re just moving things from one inbox to the next. That’s why teams are searching for ways to make their days a little less hectic.

Anatomy of a Typical Publishing Workflow

Everyone’s process is slightly different, but most editorial workflows include these major steps:

  1. Content Request or Idea Submission
    Someone suggests a topic or article.

  2. Content Planning & Assignment
    The editor or content manager assigns the task.

  3. Writing
    The writer drafts the piece, adds keywords, images, and links.

  4. Review & Editing
    Editors (sometimes more than one) go through the content.

  5. Approval
    Final signoff to ensure brand guidelines and quality.

  6. Publishing
    Content goes live on the website or distributed anywhere else it’s supposed to appear.

  7. Performance Tracking
    Teams monitor viewing stats and engagement.

  8. Updating & Archiving
    Old posts may get refreshed, or retired.

Where Workflows Get Messy

In real life, bottlenecks pop up:

  • Multiple people edit the same doc and changes get lost.

  • Feedback is scattered in emails and chat threads.

  • People forget to update the plan after changes.

  • Someone publishes before approvals are finished.

I’ve seen teams spend days just untangling who made the latest edit to an article.

How Automation Works in CMS Publishing

Let’s zoom in. Most modern CMS tools let you define automated workflows:

  • You set rules for who approves what.

  • Assign deadlines so nothing gets stuck.

  • Automate steps like sending reminders or moving approved content to “ready to publish.”

For example, some CMS systems offer plug-ins or built-in features to:

  • Require at least one editor to approve before content goes live.

  • Move drafts to the next person in the chain without waiting for emails.

  • Run automated checks for grammar, duplicate content, or accessibility.

  • Schedule posts to publish at a certain time, even if no one is at their desk.

All this frees your editors from babysitting the process, so they can do their real work—making sure content is clear, accurate, and engaging.

Key Benefits: How Automated Publishing Cuts Down Editorial Work

Here’s what teams typically notice, once they move to automated publishing workflows:

1. More Time for Real Editing

Instead of spending hours following up on approvals, editors can focus on actual editing—improving stories, not tracking who has reviewed what.

2. Fewer Mistakes

Automated checks help spot errors, broken links, and missed approvals. This leads to fewer embarrassing errors making it to readers.

3. Consistent Quality

Workflows ensure every article gets the same level of review and checks—no more “some articles got the full process, others didn’t.”

4. Faster Publishing Speeds

Content moves smoothly from draft to live post without manual delays at every step. One report even found teams saving close to 30 minutes per article on routine tasks.

5. Happier Teams

Editorial burnout is real. Automating the repetitive stuff means fewer headaches and more creative energy for the real work.

What Types of Tasks Can You Automate?

You might be surprised how many editorial steps are perfect for automation. Here are a few:

  • Article Status Tracking: No more asking if something is “in progress” or “waiting on approval.” The system handles it.

  • Notifications and Reminders: Automated emails or alerts keep everyone moving.

  • Approvals: Content won’t publish until the right person gives the go-ahead.

  • Grammar and Plagiarism Checks: Built-in tools can catch problems before editors see them.

  • Cross-Channel Publishing: Push a post to the website, social media, and email all at once.

  • Archiving and Updates: Set reminders for when to review or update content automatically.

Common Questions About Automated Workflows in CMS

Can you customize workflows in any CMS?
Most modern CMS systems allow some level of workflow customization. Some have drag-and-drop workflow builders; others support plug-ins for more complicated needs.

Do automated workflows replace editors?
Not at all. Automation supports editors, making their jobs easier by taking care of repetitive tasks so they can focus on the creative and unique parts.

Is there a risk of mistakes being published?
Good workflows won’t let content go live before all required approvals. Plus, automated checks catch simple errors. Human review is still key for tone, accuracy, and context.

How hard is it to set up an automated workflow?
It depends on your CMS and how complex your needs are. Many have templates to start with. For deeper customization, a CMS Development Company can often set up or tailor workflows to fit what your team does best.

Choosing the Right CMS Features for Better Workflows

When you’re picking or upgrading your CMS, look for features that support smart workflows. Some of these can include:

  • Role-based Access: Editors, contributors, and admins have different permissions.

  • Custom Approval Chains: Maybe an editor approves blog posts, but legal checks the press releases.

  • Integrated Tools: Look for built-in grammar checkers, SEO tools, or analytics.

  • Notifications and Reporting: The CMS should keep everyone informed and offer data on how content is performing.

  • Scheduled Publishing: Push content live even when your team is away.

Some WordPress tools and plug-ins even work inside the CMS to manage real-time editorial feedback and version tracking. You can also take help of a CMS Development company to choose the right CMS.

Step-by-Step: Automating Your Publishing Workflow

If your team is new to automation, here’s a beginner-friendly plan:

1. Map Out Your Existing Workflow

  • Who does what?

  • Where do things get stuck?

  • What tasks are repetitive?

2. Choose Your CMS (or Upgrade)

  • Decide if your current CMS can automate these steps.

  • Research plug-ins or modules that add workflow features if needed.

3. Set Up Roles and Permissions

  • Give people only the access they need to prevent mishaps.

4. Design the Workflow

  • Build the chain of steps: write → edit → review → publish.

  • Use templates available in your CMS if possible.

5. Automate Notifications

  • Turn on alerts, reminders, and approval prompts.

6. Test With Real Content

  • Run a few articles through the process to find gaps.

7. Adjust, Measure, and Improve

  • Use analytics to find new bottlenecks.

  • Ask your team what’s working or still a pain.

Challenges to Watch Out For

Even the best automation can have hiccups. Here are a few things to keep an eye on:

  • Over-Complicating Workflows: Too many steps can slow things down instead of speeding them up.

  • Lack of Flexibility: Sometimes a process needs to change fast—make sure your workflow can adapt.

  • High Initial Setup Time: Setting up takes energy up front, but saves countless hours later.

  • Wrong Tools for Your Team: Every team works differently. Don’t force a workflow that goes against your culture.

How to Get Editors On Board

Automation can be tricky. Some people worry about new tools, or feel like they’re giving up control. In my experience, start small: automate one part of the process, and show how much easier afternoons become. It can help to involve editors in designing the workflow so they feel like it’s for them—not just thrust upon them.

Remind everyone: automation isn’t about replacing anyone; it’s about letting humans do what they’re best at—storytelling, creativity, and judgment.

What Else Can Automation Do?

Automated workflows aren’t just for editorial steps:

  • Legal Review: Ensure nothing goes live without legal signoff.

  • SEO Checking: Automated scans for keywords, titles, and meta descriptions.

  • Multimedia Integration: Auto-formatting images and videos for multiple platforms.

  • Localization: Trigger translations for global content teams.

  • Analytics Reports: Generate and send regular performance summaries.

With digital content production only growing, having a strong, automated workflow can keep your team organized even as things scale up.

When to Call in the Pros

Sometimes, your needs go beyond what default CMS settings can handle. If you want to connect publishing with marketing, automate translations, or make deep changes to the workflow, it might be time to bring in experts.

A good CMS Development Company can:

  • Review what your team does now, in detail.

  • Recommend the best CMS or plug-ins for your budget.

  • Customize workflow automation to fit your exact needs.

  • Offer training so everyone feels comfortable with the new system.

Bringing in outside help saves trial and error—and often a lot of team headaches.

The Bottom Line:  

Publishing shouldn’t feel like running in circles. Automated workflows in your CMS help you get back valuable hours, lower errors, and create more reliable, enjoyable processes for all involved. 

As content demands keep rising, these systems let editors focus less on chasing down tasks and more on producing content they’re proud of.

I’d say try automating just one or two steps at first, watch the difference, then keep building on that foundation.  

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

ezine articles
Logo