Uttarakhand Eco Tourism Scam | The Probe Impact: Govt Transfers Bhargav

Uttarakhand Eco Tourism Scam: The Probe had exposed the scandal; now the govt has transferred IFS officer Dr. Vinay Kumar Bhargav, whose name figures in the scam.
Uttarakhand Eco Tourism Scam: IFS Officer Transferred
On 24 August 2025, The Probe published an investigation that first exposed the Uttarakhand eco-tourism scam. Following this, we reported how the whistleblower, IFS officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi, who blew the lid off the scam, was abruptly transferred. Now, under mounting public and political pressure following the exposé, the Dhami government has moved against the officer named in the Uttarakhand eco-tourism scam — IFS officer Dr. Vinay Kumar Bhargav.
Dr. Bhargav faces serious allegations of corruption, illegal construction inside forest land, diversion of revenues, and fabrication of official records. In December 2024, Chaturvedi’s report accused him of sanctioning permanent concrete structures inside the fragile Khaliya Reserve Forest in Munsiyari without clearance, misappropriating over ₹1.6 crore, diverting 70% of tourism revenue to a society before it was even registered, and approving expenditure on 90 km of non-existent fire lines.
In the latest reshuffle, Dr. Bhargav, who was stationed as Conservator of Forest (West) in Haldwani, has now been shifted to Director of the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve in Gopeshwar, Chamoli district. The move takes him away from a resource-heavy and influential post in Haldwani to a relatively isolated conservation role. While the Nanda Devi Biosphere is ecologically significant, officials note that the new assignment lacks the same power, budgetary control, and administrative clout.
The Probe had earlier reported how whistleblower Sanjiv Chaturvedi was shunted out after he exposed the scam. Instead of cracking down on those accused of financial irregularities, in an interview with The Probe, the state’s Principal Secretary, R.K. Sudhanshu, chose to question Chaturvedi’s authority to approach the Centre. Rather than seeking accountability from those allegedly involved in the scam, the government appeared more inclined to target the officer who reported it.

